Post-Voided Residual Ratio Does Not Predict Trifecta Outcome after Transurethral Resection of Prostate.

The purpose of this study was to assess the importance of the post-void residual (PVR) ratio (PVR ratio) in achieving a favorable trifecta outcome for patients suffering from lower urinary tract symptoms and benign prostatic enlargement (LUTS-BPE) who undergo transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). Starting from 2015, a series of patients with LUTS-BPE who underwent TURP were included in a forward-looking study. These patients were assessed using the international prostate symptom score (IPSS) screening tool, uroflowmetry, and a transrectal ultrasound to measure prostate volume (TRUS). Both the PVR urine volume and the PVR ratio (PVR-R), which is the PVR as a percentage of total bladder volume (voided volume + PVR), were measured. The assessment of outcomes was based on the trifecta favorable outcome, defined as meeting all of the following criteria: (1) absence of perioperative complications, (2) a postoperative IPSS of less than eight, and (3) a postoperative maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) greater than 15 mL/s. A total of 143 patients were included, with a median age of 70 years (interquartile range 65-73). Of these, 58% (83/143) achieved a positive trifecta outcome. Upon conducting a multivariate analysis, both IPSS and Qmax were identified as predictors of a positive trifecta outcome, whereas the PVR-R did not prove to be an independent predictor. In summary, it was found that preoperative IPSS and Qmax are indicative of a trifecta outcome following TURP, whereas PVR-R is not.

Medications Mostly Associated With Ejaculatory Disorders: Assessment of the Eudra-Vigilance and Food and Drug Administration Pharmacovigilance Databases Entries.

OBJECTIVE: To identify which medications are mostly associated with ejaculatory disorders through a disproportionality analysis. METHODS: The Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FDA-FAERS) and the Eudra-Vigilance (EV) database were queried to identify medications more commonly associated to ejaculatory disorders from September 10, 2012 to June 1, 2023. Proportional Reported Ratios (PRRs) were computed for all the selected drugs. RESULTS: Overall, 7404 reports of ejaculatory disorders reports were identified, and of these, 6854 cases (92.6%) were attributed to ten specific medications. On FDA-FAERS and EV databases, Paroxetine and Tamsulosin were the main responsible of delayed ejaculation (103/448 events, 23.0%) and retrograde ejaculation (366/1033 events, 35.4%), respectively. Finasteride was mostly related to painful ejaculation and ejaculation failure, with 150 events (7.8%) and 735 events (38.4%) respectively. Within the group of high-risk medications, Sildenafil presented higher risk of ejaculatory disorders than Tadalafil (PRR=5.85 (95%CI 5.09-6.78), P < .01). CONCLUSION: Ten drugs were recognized to display significant reporting levels of ejaculatory disorders. Among them, Finasteride and Sildenafil were responsible for the most reports in FDA-FAERS and in EV databases, respectively. Physicians should thoroughly counsel patients treated with these drugs about the risk of ejaculatory disorders. Further integration into clinical trials is needed to enhance the applicability and significance of these results.

Adverse events related to darolutamide treatment: analysis of "real life" data from EudraVigilance and the Food and Drug Administration database entries.

BACKGROUND: Aim of our study was to analyze adverse events (AEs) associated with darolutamide using real life data from Eudra-Vigilance (EV) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) databases. METHODS: EV database in European Economic Area (EEA) and the FDA FAERS database were queried to identify darolutamide AEs occurred from 30th July 2019 to May 2022. AEs were recorded in according to category and severity. Real-life data was compared to Aramis registry study. RESULTS: The total number of AEs including data from both databases was 409 reported by FDA-FAERS and 253 reported by EV databases. On registry study, 794 AEs were reported, with serious AEs occurring in 24.8% of patients in the darolutamide group and with 1 death related to trial regimen. The most frequently reported AEs from both database were general disorders (33% and 26%), investigations (19% and 22%), gastrointestinal (15% and 11%), renal and urinary (9%), gastrointestinal (6%) and musculoskeletal disorder (5%). CONCLUSIONS: According to our results darolutamide is safe in a real-life scenario and the most frequent side effect is fatigue. Although up to now there are few reports in both real-life databases, these data are encouraging for clinicians using darolutamide in every day clinical practice.